检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾伟良 王伟[1,2] 汪翠梅 郭丽丽 Zeng Weiliang;Wang Wei;Wang Cuimei;Guo Lili(Department of Plastic Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China;Open Laboratory of Key Clinical Medicine Disciplines in Henan University,Zhengzhou 450052,China)
机构地区:[1]郑州大学第一附属医院整形外科,郑州450052 [2]河南省高等学校临床医学重点学科开放实验室,郑州450052
出 处:《中华医学美学美容杂志》2021年第1期34-37,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology
基 金:河南省教育厅高等院校重点项目(18A320060)。
摘 要:目的探讨健康年轻女性不同身高、体重对耳垂形态的影响,为耳垂整形手术提供参考资料。方法2016年3—7月,郑州大学第一附属医院整形外科测量266名健康年轻女性的身高、体重、耳宽形态、耳长形态、耳宽貌、耳长貌、耳垂宽、耳垂长等项目,计算各测量值±s,对有关各项指标用SPSS 15.0统计软件进行分析。结果266名健康年轻女性身高(162.9±4.1)cm、体重(55.3±6.5)kg、耳宽形态(4.9±0.6)cm、耳长形态(2.9±0.3)cm、耳宽貌(6.2±0.4)cm、耳长貌(3.3±0.3)cm、耳垂宽(1.6±0.3)cm、耳垂长(1.8±0.2)cm、耳垂宽耳宽貌指数(25.6±4.9)%、耳垂长耳长貌指数(53.69±7.69)%、耳垂指数(91.4±19.3)%。不同身高、体重的耳宽形态、耳长形态、耳宽貌、耳长貌、耳垂长、耳垂长耳长貌指数、耳垂指数比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);不同身高的耳垂宽、耳垂宽耳宽貌指数比较,差异有统计学意义(F=3.27、F=3.64,均P<0.05)。结论耳宽形态、耳长形态、耳宽貌、耳长貌、耳垂长、耳垂长耳长貌指数、耳垂指数与身高、体重均无关;耳垂宽、耳垂宽耳宽貌指数与身高有关,与体重无关。Objective To investigate auricular lobule index difference in healthy young female of different height or weight,and to provide an additional reference for otoplasty of auricular lobule.Methods Subjects were made up of 266 healthy young females of Henan residents.Their height,weight,physiognomic ear breadth,morphological ear breadth,physiognomic ear length,morphological ear length,auricular lobule length,auricular lobule breadth were measured and calculated.All the data were analyzed by SPSS 15.0 software.Results We obtained the means,standard deviation of each items,and data were treated statistically.In the 266 subjects,average height was(162.9±4.1)cm,weight(55.3±6.5)kg,morphological ear breadth(4.9±0.6)cm,morphological ear length(2.9±0.3)cm,physiognomic ear breadth(6.2±0.4)cm,physiognomic ear length(3.3±0.3)cm,auricular lobule breadth(1.6±0.3)cm,auricular lobule length(1.8±0.2)cm,lobule physiognomic ear breadth index(25.6±4.9)%,lobule-physiognomic ear length index(53.69±7.69)%,and auricular lobule index(91.4±19.3)%.The differences among the indices mentioned above were of statistical significance(P<0.05);the indices of subjects of different height were significantly different(P<0.05);the indices of subjects of different weight were of no statistical difference.(P>0.05).Conclusions The subjects of different height or weight have no different morphological ear breadth,morphological ear length,physiognomic ear breadth,physiognomic ear length,auricular lobule length,lobule-physiognomic ear length index and auricular lobule index;hence,the indices are no related to body height and weight.However,the subjects of different height have different auricular lobule breadth and lobule-physiognomic ear breadth index.
分 类 号:R194.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.225.34.193