论审判公开制度在“司法边缘化地区”的实质化途径——以《送法下乡》中“耕牛纠纷案”为例  

On the Substantial Ways of the Open Trial System in the“Judicial Marginal Areas”——Take the“Cattle Dispute Case”in Sending Law to the Countryside as an Example

作　　者：舒鑫 SHU Xin(College Of Philosophy,Law&Political Science,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200000,China)

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学哲学与法政学院,上海200000

出　　处：《宜春学院学报》2021年第2期39-43,69,共6页Journal of Yichun University

摘　　要：“司法边缘化地区”的居民缺少对于法律的信仰。换句话说,法治的理想并未落实到司法边缘化的地区中去。法律对司法边缘地区的约束力不足。一方面实践生活中,实际上用法律解决问题的时刻较少(农村地区解决纠纷多依靠私力救济);另一方面,对于边缘地区的普法并未完全,即许多村民是不懂法律的,在此意义上,还存在律师参与不够、法律援助不足等问题。审判公开制度在该地区发挥不出应有的作用。将裁判过程在该地区有效地公开,促使居民参与到裁判的制作过程中去,有利于司法公信力在边缘化地区的树立,有利于审判公开制度在边缘化地区落到实处。Residents in“judicial marginalized areas”lack faith in the law.In other words,the ideal of the rule of law has not been implemented in areas where the judiciary is marginalized.The law has insufficient binding force on judicial marginal areas.On the one hand,in practical life,there are actually fewer moments to solve problems by law(disputes in rural areas mostly rely on private relief);On the other hand,the popularization of law in marginal areas is not complete,that is,many villagers do not understand the law.In this sense,there are still some problems such as insufficient participation of lawyers and insufficient legal aid.The open trial system does not play its due role in this area.It is conducive to the establishment of judicial credibility in marginalized areas and the implementation of the open trial system in marginalized areas to effectively open the referee process in this area and encourage residents to participate in the referee making process.

关 键 词：裁判过程 司法边缘化地区 审判公开 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]