论安保义务人服务外包致损时的侵权责任  

The Tort Liability of Security Obligors in Outsourcing Service Relationship

作　　者：项彦 Xiang Yan(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan,Hubei 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《湖北工程学院学报》2021年第2期91-97,共7页Journal of Hubei Engineering University

基　　金：中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(202110648)。

摘　　要：安保义务人将相关服务外包的情形多有发生,双方成立委托关系的前提下,实践中对于受托服务提供方行为所导致的损害责任分担存有不同观点。安保义务不因合同关系而转移,但转化为对服务提供方的选任与持续监督义务。德国法上交往安全义务囊括了各种作为义务之来源,受限于我国《民法典》第1198条之文义与规范意旨,安保义务课以特定主体承担,受托服务提供方行为后果不可完全由委托方安保义务人承受,但其可因未履行在先行为等引起的作为义务而承担侵权责任,双方均具有过错时构成无意思联络之数人侵权。Security obligors often outsource related services.In judicial practice,there are different views on the liability for damages caused by the entrusted service provider.The obligation of security can not be transferred with the contractual relationship,but shifted into the obligation of selection and continuous supervision.Limited by the meaning of article 1198 of the Civil Code,the security obligation is undertaken by a specific subject.The consequences of the trustee’s behavior can not be completely born by the security obligors,but they may bear the tort liability in certain circumstances.

关 键 词：安全保障义务 服务外包 事务辅助人 无意思联络数人侵权 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]