检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李培[1] 王欣[1] 李梅莉[1] 刘静[1] 杨雪莹[1] 张明[1] 曾强[1] LI Pei;WANG Xin;LI Mei-li;LIU Jing;YANG Xue-ying;ZHANG Ming;ZENG Qiang(Dept of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control,Tianjin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Tianjin 300011,China)
机构地区:[1]天津市疾病预防控制中心职业病预防控制室,天津300011
出 处:《工业卫生与职业病》2021年第2期93-96,共4页Industrial Health and Occupational Diseases
基 金:青年医学新锐人才项目(2018)。
摘 要:目的调查天津市辖区内职业病防治机构职业病防治能力。方法本研究数据收集通过全国重点职业病监测信息系统。收集内容包括职业病防治机构底数、职业病防治机构基本情况、职业病防治机构专业技术人员情况和职业健康检查以及职业病诊断工作开展情况。结果天津市辖区内职业病防治机构41家,其中,职业健康检查机构20家,职业病诊断机构8家。职业病诊断医师、职业健康检查医师、职业病报告信息员和重点职业病监测人员分别为111名、283名、62名和47名。天津市煤尘、矽尘、石棉尘、苯、铅、噪声接触工作人员在岗期间职业健康检查疑似职业病检出人数与网报疑似职业病人数均高于离岗时,上岗前职业健康检查职业禁忌证检出人数与网报职业禁忌证人数均低于在岗期间,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。煤尘、矽尘、石棉尘、苯、铅、噪声接触工作人员在岗期间职业健康检查疑似职业病检出人数高于网报的疑似职业病人数,上岗前职业健康检查职业禁忌证检出人数高于网报的职业禁忌证人数,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论天津市辖区内职业病防治机构覆盖率低,从事职业病防治的工作人员整体数量不足。职业病健康检查网报率仍需进一步提高。Objective To investigate occupational disease prevention and control capacity in Tianjin.Methods Data was collected through the National Key Occupational Disease Monitoring Information System in this study,including the number of occupational disease prevention and control institutions,the basic situation of occupational disease prevention and control institutions,the status of professional staffs who work on occupational disease prevention and control institutions,and the progress of occupational health examination.Results There were 41 occupational disease prevention and control institutions,a total of 20 occupational health examination agencies and 8 diagnosis agencies of occupational diseases in Tianjin.The number of occupational disease diagnostics physicians,occupational health examination physicians,occupational disease reporting information officers and key occupational disease monitoring personnel were 111,283,62 and 47 respectively.The number of suspected occupational disease for occupational health examination and network reporting on employment period workers were higher than post-job workers who exposed to coal dust,silica dust,asbestos dust,benzene,lead and noise,the difference was statistically significant.The number of occupational contraindication for occupational health examination and network reporting on pre-job workers were lower than that on employment period workers,the difference was statistically significant.The number of suspected occupational disease for occupational health examination were higher than network reporting on employment period workers who exposed to coal dust,silica dust,asbestos dust,benzene,lead and noise,the difference was statistically significant.The number of occupational contraindication for occupational health examination on pre-job workers were higher than network reporting,the difference was statistically significant.Conclusions The coverage rate of occupational disease prevention and control institutions in Tianjin is low.The overall staff working in prevention
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.90.165