目录学经史关系探析  

Discussion of the Relationship Between Confucian Classics and History in Bibliography

作　　者：徐定懿 Xu Dingyi

机构地区：[1]南京农业大学《中国农史》编辑部,江苏南京210095

出　　处：《山东图书馆学刊》2021年第2期31-37,共7页The Library Journal of Shandong

摘　　要：中国古代目录沿革的历史内在对应着经学发展史。在经学大背景下来审视目录学分类的经、史关系,可以发现经、史两部代表了国家意识形态,经、史处于离王权中心近的位置;而子、集则处于离王权中心较远的地位。还能总结出如下变化规律:但凡在经学正统期,比如汉、唐,目录分类明显重经、史;但凡在经学嬗变期,如宋、明,则经、史、子、集分类都有打乱,且不强调承载道统,因此在对待经、史、子、集上没有特别明显的轻重区分。而清代既是经学最后的复兴期,也是书目分类上四部法集大成的时期;但到了清末,书目分类为“实用”所突破,正如经学在经过清代最后的辉煌之后走向了没落一样,书目也无法再恪守四部分类,经、史的特殊亲缘关系也不复存在。The history of bibliography directly reflected the development of Confucian Classics.Based on the Confucian Classics history,Confucian Classics and history in bibliography were close to the state power.However,Zi and Ji were far away from it.So,Confucian Classics and history represented the national will.By the analysis of the paper,we could know that on the stable phase of Confucian Classics history such as Han and Tang dynasty,the bibliography mostly focused on Confucian Classics and history.However,on the reform period of the Confucian Classics history such as Song and Ming dynasty,the classification of Confucian Classics,history,Zi and Ji was disorganized.And there was no more emphasis on Confucian Classics and history.The Qing dynasty was the last renaissance of Confucian Classics,and also the last prosperous time for the Four-Branch Classification of bibliography.But at the end of the Qing dynasty,the Four-Branch Classification changed to the scientific classification.As the Confucian Classics came to the end,the close relation between Confucian Classics and history was no longer in existence.

关 键 词：目录学 经学 经史关系 四部分类法 

分 类 号：G257[文化科学—图书馆学]