论在线庭审模式的适用规范  被引量:1

On the Applicable Norms of Online Trial Mode

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:汪闰月 WANG Runyue(Law School, Central South University, Changsha 410006, China)

机构地区:[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410006

出  处:《广东石油化工学院学报》2021年第2期6-10,共5页Journal of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology

摘  要:与线下庭审相比,在线庭审模式缺乏在场性、仪式感等程序要素,造成直接言词原则的适用基础被削弱、程序说服功能弱化以及司法权威无法充分展现。因此,对于一些注重直接言词原则贯彻、程序说服功能发挥以及司法权威树立的案件,不宜使用在线庭审模式。而对于适宜在线庭审的民事、行政案件,立法应赋予当事人“合意”选择权;适合在线庭审的刑事案件,应根据被告人选择确定庭审方式。庭审过程中的程序转换规则也应以此为基础确立。Compared with offline trial,online trial mode lacks procedural elements such as presence and ritual sense,which weakens the application basis of the principle of direct speech,weakens the function of procedural persuasion and fails to fully demonstrate the judicial authority.Therefore,it is not suitable to apply the online trial mode to some cases that focus on the implementation of the principle of direct speech,the function of procedural persuasion and the establishment of judicial authority.For civil and administrative cases that are suitable for online trial,the legislation should give the parties a“consenting”option.Criminal cases suitable for online trial should be decided according to the defendant's choice.The rules of procedural conversion in court proceedings should also be established on this basis.

关 键 词:在线庭审 适用范围 适用方式 程序转换 

分 类 号:D926.2[政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象