检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪闰月 WANG Runyue(Law School, Central South University, Changsha 410006, China)
出 处:《广东石油化工学院学报》2021年第2期6-10,共5页Journal of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology
摘 要:与线下庭审相比,在线庭审模式缺乏在场性、仪式感等程序要素,造成直接言词原则的适用基础被削弱、程序说服功能弱化以及司法权威无法充分展现。因此,对于一些注重直接言词原则贯彻、程序说服功能发挥以及司法权威树立的案件,不宜使用在线庭审模式。而对于适宜在线庭审的民事、行政案件,立法应赋予当事人“合意”选择权;适合在线庭审的刑事案件,应根据被告人选择确定庭审方式。庭审过程中的程序转换规则也应以此为基础确立。Compared with offline trial,online trial mode lacks procedural elements such as presence and ritual sense,which weakens the application basis of the principle of direct speech,weakens the function of procedural persuasion and fails to fully demonstrate the judicial authority.Therefore,it is not suitable to apply the online trial mode to some cases that focus on the implementation of the principle of direct speech,the function of procedural persuasion and the establishment of judicial authority.For civil and administrative cases that are suitable for online trial,the legislation should give the parties a“consenting”option.Criminal cases suitable for online trial should be decided according to the defendant's choice.The rules of procedural conversion in court proceedings should also be established on this basis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.148.202