宋代铸造的唐代年号镜——仿古和逐利影响下的宋代工艺美术个案  

The Song Bronze Mirror with the Tang Reign Mark——A Case Study of the Song-Dynasty Arts and Crafts Modeling after Antiques for Profits

作　　者：范淑英[1] Fan Shuying

机构地区：[1]西安美术学院美术史论系

出　　处：《故宫博物院院刊》2021年第3期30-44,108,109,共17页Palace Museum Journal

基　　金：陕西省社科界2020年度重大理论与现实问题研究项目“唐代艺术的文化认同对多元统一国家形象塑造的意义研究”(2020Z236);陕西高校人文社会科学青年英才支持计划(2014);西安美术学院“艺术考古学科高地建设项目”(YSXLL-201902)。

摘　　要：自1945年梅原末治《唐镜大观》著录两面"永徽元年"铜镜以来,考古出土和文物征集发现多件带有"贞观元年""贞观十六年""永徽元年""上元二年""大和元年"等唐代年号的铜镜。这些铜镜因有明确的纪年,在唐代铜镜艺术研究中曾被作为标准器对待。但这些铜镜在造型、铭文书体、纹饰等方面,皆与唐代铜镜有异,而与宋代铜镜相合。本文对5种8件带有唐代年号的铜镜予以重新考察,认为它们与一般宋代的仿唐镜不同,一是没有铸镜作坊铭或是姓氏铭;二是铜质精良;三是花纹清晰。因此,这8件器物应为宋代铸造的仿唐镜。Following the bronze mirror marked with the Chinese characters of ‘ 永徽元年’( Yonghui 1 st Year) on both sides just mentioned in the Tang Mirrors by Archaeologist Umehara Sueji, a large number of bronze mirrors with the reign marks of the Tang dynasty such as ‘ 贞观元年’(Zhenguan 1 st Year), ‘ 贞观十六年’(Zhenguan 16 th Year), ‘ 永徽元年’( Yonghui 1 st Year), ‘ 上元二年’( Shangyuan 2 nd Year), ‘ 大和元年’( Dahe 1 st Year) have been discovered in archaeological excavation and historical relics acquisition, which used to be in style considered as the typical representative of the Tang-dynasty bronze mirror art. However, it is studied that these Tang reign-marked bronze mirrors are not the same in shape, style in calligraphy and ornamentation as the ones of the Tang Dynasty, but close to those of the Song Dynasty. Compared with the Tang-styled bronze mirror popular in the Song dynasty, these Tang reign-marked mirrors without manufacturers or craftsman’s surname are actually the products of the Song Dynasty, high-quality with distinct motifs. The mirror manufacturers expected more profits from the bronze mirrors with the reign marks of earlier dynasty this way.

关 键 词：唐宋 铜镜 仿古 年代 

分 类 号：K875.2[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学] K244[历史地理—历史学]