检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王书斌[1] Wang Shubin(Industry Development Research Institute,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics)
机构地区:[1]南京财经大学江苏产业发展研究院,江苏南京210023
出 处:《经济科学》2021年第2期85-96,共12页Economic Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目“扶贫开发政策对贫困地区企业绩效的影响研究:作用机制、地理异质与政策优化”(项目编号:71903082)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:本文以工业企业资本增长作为切入点,考察扶贫开发政策对贫困地区的"引资"效应,具体以2011年第三轮贫困县名单调整设计准自然试验,并控制多重区域政策叠加效应和经济趋势干扰。本文证实了政策能够显著促进贫困地区企业资本增长,在此过程中法人资本增加明显带动了集体资本增长,并且对于高劳动生产率企业资本增长的促进作用尤为明显。机理检验探明,政策推行可使企业享受更高补贴红利、实现更快业绩提升、获取更多金融资本,进而推动企业资本增长。融入空间经济因素,本文发现政策减弱了因区际经济悬殊而导致的贫困地区高效率企业流失问题。This paper takes industrial enterprises’ capital growth as the breakthrough point to examine the function of poverty alleviation and development policy attracting capital in povertystricken areas. Quasi-natural test based on the third adjustment of poverty-stricken county list in2011 is designed,and the superimposed effect of regional policies and economic trend interference have been properly handled. It is confirmed that the policy can significantly promote the capital growth of enterprises in poverty-stricken areas,among which the increase in corporate capital obviously drives the growth of collective capital. Moreover,enterprises with high productivity are more easily affected. Mechanism analysis shows that the policy can encourage capital growth of enterprises in poverty-stricken areas by helping enterprises enjoy higher subsidy dividend,faster performance improvement and more adequate financial capital. With spatial economic factors considered,further findings show that the policy reduces the loss of enterprises with high efficiency caused by the inter-regional economic disparity.
分 类 号:F061.3[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49