检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨国桢[1] 赵红强 Yang Guozhen;Zhao Hongqiang
机构地区:[1]厦门大学人文学院历史系,福建厦门361005
出 处:《学术研究》2021年第4期109-114,178,共7页Academic Research
摘 要:发生在1927年至1937年的中国社会史论战,不仅对于宣传马克思主义、促进唯物史观在中国的传播影响深远,而且对改变传统史学范式、促成社会经济史研究的转向也意义非凡。尤其可贵的是,这场论战启发了一批青年学生的问题意识,为他们提供了学术研究的契机,造就了一支新生的学术力量,成为以后社会经济史研究的中坚,傅衣凌(1911—1988)便是其中的佼佼者之一。中国社会史论战究竟如何影响傅衣凌,傅衣凌又如何参与这场论战?学界鲜有论及,有必要结合傅衣凌的求学经历加以分析,以更好地理解这场论战对傅衣凌学术道路的奠基意义,亦为评价社会史论战的学术意义提供一个生动的案例。The debate on Chinese social history took place from 1927 to 1937 not only had a profound impact on the promotion of Marxism and Historical Materialism in China,but also was significant of changing the traditional historiography paradigm and facilitating the shift in socioeconomic history research.Especially it inspired a group of young students’problem consciousness,provided them with opportunities for academic research and created a new academic force to become the backbone of future socioeconomic history research.Fu Yiling(1911-1988)is one of the best.How did the debate on Chinese social history affect Fu Yiling and how did Fu Yiling participate in the debate?It is rarely discussed in academic circles.It is necessary to analyze Fu Yiling’s academic experience,in order to better understand the foundational significance of this debate on Fu Yiling’s academic path and also provide a vivid case for evaluating the academic significance of the social history debate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.48.156