检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李越[1] 欧海荣[1] 李辉[1] LI Yue;OU Hai-rong;LI Hui(Department of Neurosurgery,Wuchuan People's Hospital,Zhanjiang 524500,China)
机构地区:[1]广东省吴川市人民医院神经外科,广东湛江524500
出 处:《广东医科大学学报》2021年第2期198-200,共3页Journal of Guangdong Medical University
摘 要:目的比较小骨窗开颅显微镜下血肿清除与保守治疗30~40 mL高血压基底节出血的疗效。方法57例30~40 mL高血压基底节出血患者随机采用小骨窗显微镜下血肿清除(n=30)或保守治疗(n=27),比较两组住院时间、神经功能缺损评分(NIHSS)评分、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、并发症情况。结果与保守组比较,手术组住院时间较短,并发症较少,NIHSS评分较低,而GCS评分较高(P<0.01)。结论小骨窗开颅显微镜下血肿清除治疗30~40 mL高血压基底节出血的疗效较好、更安全。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of endoscopic hematoma evacuation(EHE)with small bone window and conservative treatment in hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage(HBGH)with 30-40 mL.Methods Fiftyseven patients with 30-40 mL HBGH were randomly treated with EHE(n=30)and conservative therapy(n=27).Hospital stay,NIHSS,Glasgow coma scale(GCS)and complications were compared between two groups.Results Compared with conservative group,hospital stay,complications and NIHSS were lower,while GCS was higher in operation group(P<0.01).Conclusion EHE with small bone window is effective and safe in patients with 30-40 mL HBGH.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.179