飞针浅刺法配合短波治疗慢性腰肌劳损临床观察  被引量:3

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:肖根婷 郭永红 李铁浪[3] 汤小迪 尹海溶 刘思琪 廖子菁 

机构地区:[1]湖南中医药大学,湖南长沙410208 [2]湖南省衡阳市中医医院针推科,湖南衡阳421001 [3]湖南中医药大学针灸推拿学院,湖南长沙410208

出  处:《实用中医药杂志》2021年第4期680-681,共2页Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Medicine

摘  要:目的:观察飞针浅刺法配合短波治疗慢性腰肌劳损的临床疗效。方法:80例随机分为两组各40例,治疗组用飞针浅刺法加减配合短波,对照组只用短波治疗。结果:总有效率治疗组95.0%、对照组77.5%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=7.724,P=0.021)。治疗后VAS评分治疗组(1.95±1.45)分、对照组(3.50±1.50)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(z=-1.945)。ODI评分治疗后治疗组(15.60±4.52)分、对照组(24.2±5.78)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:飞针浅刺法配合短波治疗慢性腰肌劳损疗效较好,且安全。Objective:To observe the clinical effect of flying needle shallow puncture method combined with short wave on chronic lumbar muscle strain.Methods:Eighty cases were randomly divided into two groups,with 40 cases in each group.The treatment group were treated with flying needle shallow puncture method combined with short wave while the control group were treated with short wave only.Results:The total effective rate was 95.0%in the treatment group and 77.5%in the control group.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(χ^(2)=7.724,P=0.021).After treatment,VAS scores were scored in the treatment group(1.95±1.45 points)and the control group(3.50±1.50).The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(z=-1.945).After treatment,ODI score was(15.60±4.52)points in the treatment group and(24.2±5.78)points in the control group.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The flying needle shallow puncture method combined with short-wave treatment is effective and safe in the treatment of chronic lumbar muscle strain.

关 键 词:慢性腰肌劳损 飞针浅刺法 短波 

分 类 号:R245.319.854[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象