并合主义:刑罚正当性根据的应然选择  

Conformity:An Ideal Choice for the Penalty Legitimacy

作　　者：韩博雅 徐岱[1] HAN Bo-ya;XU Dai

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,长春130012

出　　处：《延边大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第3期126-131,144,共7页Journal of Yanbian University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(15BFX071)。

摘　　要：根据传统刑罚理论的观点,刑罚正当性的根据存在着报应刑论和目的刑论之间的对立。刑罚体系的构建要么贯彻报应刑论,主张量刑依据行为人主观恶性程度和客观所造成的法益侵害程度;要么坚持目的刑论,提倡量刑必须考虑行为的再犯可能性以及对社会民众的一般预防。但是,无论是报应刑论还是目的刑论都有明显的弊端,并合主义的兴起能够为两种理论的并存提供空间。围绕刑罚正当性根据思考不应仅仅局限于非此即彼的范式,而是通过吸收借鉴,将报应刑和目的刑各自的优势予以整合,构建多元化的刑罚正当性根据。只有明确了刑罚的正当性根据,才能将刑罚效用发挥至最大,并对国家发动刑罚权进行有效的限制。According to traditional penalty theories,there is a contradiction in legitimacy between karma punishment and purpose punishment.The construction of the penalty system either carries out karma punishment,advocating sentence according to perpetrator’s subjective malignancy and the objective infringement,or insists on purpose punishment,which considers the possibility of repeated offence and the general prevention.The drawbacks of the two theories have inspired the conformity focusing on multi-basis legitimacy.Only by clarifying the legitimacy basis of penalty,can the effect of penalty be brought into full play and the state penalty be effectively restricted.

关 键 词：刑罚正当性根据 报应刑 目的刑 刑罚裁量 再犯可能性 并合主义 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]