非正式环境规制能够诱发绿色创新吗?——基于ENGOs视角的验证  

Can informal environmental regulation induce green innovation?:verification from the perspective of ENGOs

作　　者：赵晓梦 陈璐瑶 刘传江[2] ZHAO Xiaomeng;CHEN Luyao;LIU Chuanjiang(School of Economics and Business Administration,Central China Normal University,Wuhan Hubei 430079,China;School of Economics and Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学经济与工商管理学院,湖北武汉430079 [2]武汉大学经济与管理学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《中国人口·资源与环境》2021年第3期87-95,共9页China Population,Resources and Environment

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年项目“不同环境规制下绿色创新效应研究:微观机制与政策选择”(批准号:71903063);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金科研项目“中国环境规制政策的碳避难所效应检验”(批准号:CCNU18XJ038);中央高校基本科研业务费丹桂计划项目“中国环境规制政策的波特假说再检验——基于强、弱和狭义波特假说的三重视角”(批准号:CCNU19A0312)。

摘　　要：绿色创新是实现经济增长和环境污染治理双赢的关键所在,以环境非政府组织为代表的非正式环境规制正在发挥着越来越重要的作用。文章以2008年两家环境非政府组织——IPE和NRDC联合公示中国113个城市的“污染源监管信息公开指数”(PITI)作为准自然实验,并采取DID和DID-PSM识别方法评估非正式环境规制绿色创新的“净作用”,得到了如下主要研究结论。①非正式环境规制的确诱发了城市绿色创新,通过一系列平行趋势检验、DID-PSM回归检验和安慰剂检验之后,结果仍具有稳健性。②基于区域异质性视角分析,东部和西部地区对非正式环境规制给予了更多的关注,对PITI的发布响应更加积极,而中部地区则受到冲击效果较弱。基于时间趋势视角分析,非正式环境规制诱发的绿色创新效应在政策实施第一年最为强烈,随后整体上呈现逐年弱化的趋势。③非正式环境规制的绿色创新效应在政府环境信息公开水平越高的城市表现得更加明显,此外,城市的信息扩散水平在一定程度上也影响了绿色创新效应。相较于城市的信息扩散水平而言,非正式环境规制的绿色创新效应受到环境信息公开水平的影响更为显著。④在剔除同时期的碳排放权交易试点、“五省八市”的碳试点、二氧化硫排污权交易试点等一系列可能影响城市绿色创新活动的其他环境政策冲击之后,非正式环境规制的绿色创新效应依然存在。Green innovation is the key to achieving a win-win situation between economic growth and environmental pollution control.Informal environmental regulation,represented by ENGOs,is playing an increasingly important role.This article used the‘Pollution Information Transparency Index’(PITI)of 113 cities in 2008,jointly published by two ENGOs(IPE and NRDC),as a quasi-natural experiment,and evaluated the‘net effect’of green innovation of informal environmental regulation by the identification methods of DID and DID-PSM.The main research conclusions were as follows:①Informal environmental regulation did induce urban green innovation.After passing a series of parallel trend tests,DID-PSM regression tests and placebo tests,the results were still robust.②From the perspective of regional heterogeneity,it was concluded that more attention was paid to informal environmental regulation in the eastern and western regions,which responded more positively to the release of PITI,while the central region received less impact.From the perspective of time trend,the green innovation effect induced by informal environmental regulation was the strongest in the first year of policy implementation,and then showed a trend of weakening year by year.③The green innovation effect of informal environmental regulation was more obvious in cities with higher level of government environmental information disclosure.In addition,the information diffusion level of cities also affected the green innovation effect to a certain extent.In comparison with the level of urban information diffusion,the green innovation effect of informal environmental regulation was more significantly affected by the level of environmental information disclosure.④After eliminating a series of other environmental policy shocks that were likely to affect urban green innovation activities,such as carbon emissions trading pilots in the same period,carbon emissions trading pilots in five provinces and eight cities,and sulfur dioxide emissions trading pilots,the gree

关 键 词：非正式环境规制 绿色创新 环境非政府组织 PITI 

分 类 号：F205[经济管理—国民经济]