检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何翔 He Xiang
机构地区:[1]山西晋商银行监事会
出 处:《宏观经济研究》2021年第3期160-175,共16页Macroeconomics
摘 要:近年随着政府对农村基础设施投资力度不断加大,基础设施投资为农业经济增长和脱贫攻坚作出了重要贡献,但农村基础设施投资的区域差异问题凸显,贫富差距仍然较大,农村基础设施投资仍是巩固脱贫攻坚成果的基础保障和重要内容。本文运用Theil指数法在对中国农村基础设施投资公平性测度基础上,采用面板分位数回归法探究农村基础设施投资扶贫效果,分析农村基础设施投资公平性与贫富差距的关系。研究结果表明,中国农村基础设施投资确实存在较大区域不公平性。整体农村基础设施投资水平对贫富差距的影响呈倒U型,生态环境建设基础设施投资、生活性基础设施投资和生产性基础设施投资的增加会扩大贫富差距,而农村社会发展基础设施投资的增加可以减小贫富差距。通过增加经济规模、提高城镇化水平、加强政策向农村地区倾斜以及降低农村人口密度可减小贫富差距,提高农村基础设施投资公平性也可以减小贫富差距,在以上理论和实证分析基础上提出改善农村基础设施投资公平性的对策建议。In recent years, as the government has continuously increased investment in rural infrastructure, infrastructure investment has made important contributions to agricultural economic growth and poverty alleviation. However, the problem of regional differences in rural infrastructure investment has become prominent, and the gap between the rich and the poor is still large. Rural infrastructure investment is still the basic guarantee and important content for consolidating the results of poverty alleviation. This paper uses the Theil index method to explore the effect of rural infrastructure investment on poverty alleviation based on the measurement of equity of rural infrastructure investment in China using panel quantile regression method, and analyzes the relationship between equity of rural infrastructure investment and the wealth gap. The results of the study show that there is indeed a large regional inequity in rural infrastructure investment in China. The overall rural infrastructure investment level has an inverted U-shaped effect on the wealth gap, with increases in ecological environment infrastructure investment, living infrastructure investment, and productive infrastructure investment widening the wealth gap, while increases in rural social development infrastructure investment can narrow the wealth gap. The wealth gap can be reduced by increasing the size of the economy, improving the level of urbanization, strengthening policies toward rural areas, and reducing the population density in rural areas, and the wealth gap can also be reduced by improving the equity of rural infrastructure investment, and suggestions for countermeasures to improve the equity of rural infrastructure investment are proposed on the basis of the above theory and empirical analysis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249