跨国破产对域外国际商事仲裁的效力  

The Effect of Transnational Insolvency on Extraterritorial InternationalCommercial Arbitration

作　　者：卢晓燕 LU Xiaoyan

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《国际商务研究》2021年第3期77-88,共12页International Business Research

基　　金：中国法学会部级法学研究课题"国际商事法皖的构建和功能解构"(项目编号:CLS-2018-C34)。

摘　　要：国际商事仲裁作为运用广泛的争端解决途径,常常出现在大型跨国破产案件中,与破产程序重合或交叉,甚至产生冲突。特别是当国际商事仲裁在第三方"中立"国家进行时,国际商事仲裁庭的态度和内国法院的影响都处于不确定的状态。一方面,多数情况下域外国际商事仲裁庭会重视破产程序,而非无视破产程序;另一方面,由于国际社会缺乏统一规制跨国破产的实体法,内国法院处理跨国破产案件的方法不一,主要存在3种模式:联合国模式、欧盟模式以及其他模式。但总体而言,国际社会在面对跨国破产与域外国际商事仲裁的冲突问题上呈现出了积极开展国际合作的趋势。基于此,随着"一带一路"倡议的推进,我国也应在此问题上进一步完善相关立法及司法,以更加开放的姿态融入世界经济。As a widely used way of dispute settlement,international commercial arbitration often appears in large cases of transnational insolvency,which coincides or intersects,even conflicts with the insolvency procedure.When international commercial arbitration is conducted in a third"neutral"country,the attitude of the international commercial arbitration tribunal and the influence of the domestic court are uncertain.On the one hand,in most cases,international commercial tribunals outside the region attach more importance to the insolvency procedure than ignore them.On the other hand,due to the lack of a unified substantive law to regulate transnational insolvency in the international community,domestic courts have different approaches to deal with transnational insolvency cases.There are mainly three models:the United Nations model,the European Union model and other models.On the whole,the international community has shown an active tendency to carry out international cooperation in the conflict of transnational insolvency and extraterritorial international commercial arbitration.Based on this,with the Belt and Road Initiative advancing vertically and horizontally,China also needs to further improve relevant legislation and justice on this issue and integrate into the world economy with a more open attitude.

关 键 词：跨国破产 国际商事仲裁 破产法 

分 类 号：DF974[政治法律—国际法学]