基于AHP法的城市建筑色彩评价研究——以上海为例  

Research on Color Evaluation of Urban Architecture Based on AHP Method——A Case of Shanghai

作　　者：王江波[1] 陈晨 苟爱萍 Wang Jiangbo;Chen Chen;Gou Aiping(School of Architecture,Nanjing Tech University,Nanjing Jiangsu 211816,China;School of Ecological Technology and Engineering,Shanghai Institute of Technology,Shanghai 201418,China)

机构地区：[1]南京工业大学建筑学院,江苏南京211816 [2]上海应用技术大学生态技术与工程学院,上海201418

出　　处：《城市建筑》2021年第7期44-48,181,共6页Urbanism and Architecture

基　　金：国家自然科学基金课题资助(51978329、51778364);2018年度上海市人民政府决策咨询研究重点课题——营造城市色彩,建设美丽上海(2018-A-025-B)。

摘　　要：城市色彩是城市特色的重要展现,城市色彩管控对其城市风貌的塑造至关重要。本文以上海市为例,以实地调研收集的色彩信息数据为基础,构建AHP评价模型,对上海市建筑色彩进行评价。评价结果分为"好""较好""一般""较差"和"差"5类。通过对不同评价等级建筑的空间分布、所占比例和色系表现的总结分析,得出了上海市建筑色彩总体水平处于"较好"一级。这主要是由上海的经济发达、更新保护工作开展全面造成的,但建筑形式、建筑墙面材料等因素对建筑色彩的影响依旧较大。上海依旧存在政府审批管理力度较弱、管理条例不明确、管控指标缺失等问题,未来仍需对色彩进行重点管控和持续优化。Urban color is an important manifestation of urban characteristics,and urban color control is crucial to the shaping of its urban style.Taking Shanghai as an example,this paper builds an AHP evaluation model based on the color information data collected by field surveys to evaluate the architectural colors of Shanghai.The evaluation results are divided into five categories:"best","better","general","poorer"and"poorest".Through a summary analysis of the spatial distribution,proportions and color performance of buildings of different evaluation levels,it is concluded that the color level of Shanghai’s buildings is at the"good"level.This is mainly due to Shanghai’s economic development and comprehensive renovation and protection work.However,factors such as building forms and building wall materials still have a greater impact on building colors.There are still some problems in Shanghai,such as weak government approval management,unclear management regulations,lack of control indicators,and so on.It is still necessary to focus on color control in the future.

关 键 词：AHP模型 建筑色彩 评价 上海 

分 类 号：TU985.12[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]