认罪认罚从宽制度研究--以被追诉者的上诉权为视角  

Research on the Leniency System of Pleading Guilty and Punishment--from the Perspective of the Appeal Right of the Accused

作　　者：李晏[1] 赵李琪 LI Yan;ZHAO Li-qi(College of Law,Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College,Zhangzhou Fujian 363105,China)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学嘉庚学院,福建漳州363105

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报》2021年第2期91-94,共4页Journal of Qiqihar Junior Teachers College

摘　　要：为完善司法资源配置,彰显宽严相济的刑事政策及司法宽容精神,我国在部分地区开展认罪认罚从宽制度的试点工作。该制度是一项以诉讼效益和诉讼公正为价值基础的集合性制度,从该制度的控辩协商内容、追求实质真实、程序正义及保障被追诉者自愿性出发,应授予被追诉者上诉权,但同时可能会出现滋生权利滥用,且影响制度实施效果。故应拓宽审判机关审查职能,在其基础上建立上诉案件筛选制度并合理限制上诉权,实现“效率优先,公正为本”的价值目标。In order to improve the allocation of judicial resources and demonstrate the criminal policy of both leniency and strictness and the spirit of judicial tolerance,my country has carried out pilot work of a leniency system in some areas.This system is a collective system based on the benefit of litigation and justice of litigation.Starting from the content of prosecution and defense negotiation,the pursuit of substantive truthfulness,procedural justice and the protection of the prosecution's voluntariness,the prosecutor should be granted the right of appeal,but at the same time it may breed rights abuse and affect the effect of system implementation.Therefore,the review function of the judicial organs should be broadened,based on the establishment of an appeal case screening system and reasonable restrictions on appeal rights,so as to achieve the value goal of"efficiency first and fairness-oriented".

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽制度 上诉权 自愿性 审查职能 

分 类 号：D920.4[政治法律—法学]