中日传统医学循证研究比较  

Comparison of evidence-based research in traditional medicine between China andJapan

作　　者：袁钟瑜 中山健夫 森临太郎 李博[1] YUAN Zhongyu;Nakayama Takeo;Mori Rintaro;LI Bo(Center of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence Based Medicine,Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Capital Medical University/Beijing Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100010,P.R.China;First School of Clinical Medicine,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,P.R.China;Department of Health Informatics,Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine&School of Public Health,Kyoto 606-8316,Japan)

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学附属北京中医医院循证医学中心/北京市中医研究所,北京100010 [2]北京中医药大学第一临床医学院,北京100029 [3]日本京都大学大学院医学研究科社会健康医学系/健康情报学研究室,日本京都606-8316

出　　处：《华西医学》2021年第4期539-544,共6页West China Medical Journal

基　　金：国家“十三五”重大新药创制专项(2019ZX09734001);国家自然科学基金(81774146)。

摘　　要：循证研究是传统医学现代化的重要途径,中国和日本在中医药及汉方医学方面经过多年循证研究,取得了巨大的发展与进步,但亦存在不足和短板。该文从中日传统医学临床证据生产及评价体系、临床研究报告规范化、中日传统医学标准化、临床证据整体性评价、临床证据转化及临床研究方法学探索几个方面,对中日传统医学循证研究现状进行对比,分析各自的优势和不足,以期寻求彼此互补的领域,旨在为今后中日双方的中医药循证合作研究提供思考和启示。Evidence-based research is the essential method for the modernization of traditional medicine.China and Japan have made great progress in traditional Chinese medicine and Japanese Kampo medicine after years of evidence-based research,but there are also shortcomings.This paper compares the current situation of evidence-based research in traditional medicine from the aspects of the system of clinical evidence production and evaluation,standardization of clinical research report,standardization of traditional medicine in China and Japan,evaluation of the totality of clinical evidence via systematic review,application of clinical evidence via clinical practice guideline and development of research methodology.The purpose of this paper is to seek mutually complementary fields,and to provide enlightenment for future Chinese medicine and Japanese Kampo medicine evidence-based cooperation research.

关 键 词：中医学 日本汉方医学 循证医学 

分 类 号：R2-03[医药卫生—中医学] R79