检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程红[1] 王元昊 Cheng Hong;Wang Yuanhao
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院
出 处:《理论界》2021年第4期49-55,共7页Theory Horizon
摘 要:我国规制内幕交易罪主体的法律规范中存在不同理论基础,导致司法实践中识别内幕交易罪主体的标准不能统一。信息平等理论以知悉内幕信息为标准,信义义务理论以特定身份所承担的信义义务为标准,而两者均是对外国理论的借鉴,未充分考虑我国现行的法律体系及环境。应当立足我国本土条件,以法益保护为基础重新构建我国内幕交易罪主体的范围,对《证券法》兜底条款进行同类解释与限定解释,以职务关联性获取内幕信息作为标准,对“非法获取内幕信息的人”不应扩大解释。There are different theoretical bases in the legal norms of regulating the subject of insider trading in our country, which leads to the inconsistency of the criteria for identifying the subject of insider trading in judicial practice. The theory of information equality takes the knowledge of insider information as the standard, and the fiduciary duty takes the fiduciary duty assumed by a specific identity as the standard, and both of them are references to foreign theories and do not fully consider the current legal system and environment of our country. Based on the local conditions of our country, we should reconstruct the scope of the criminal subject of insider trading on the basis of the protection of legal interests, interpret and define the bottom clause of the securities law in the same way, and take the jobrelated access to insider information as the standard. The interpretation of "persons illegally obtaining insider information" should not be expanded.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170