检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈兴华[1] 董倩 CHEN Xinghua;DONG Qian(School of Humanities and Law, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China)
出 处:《中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第2期45-52,共8页Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)
摘 要:城镇燃气特许经营权具有天然垄断性,特许经营协议存在着主体地位悬殊、内容复杂等特点,因此城镇燃气特许经营权纠纷多发且比较复杂。城镇燃气特许经营权纠纷类型包括燃气企业之间、燃气企业与政府之间以及燃气企业与用户之间的纠纷。城镇燃气特许经营权的诉讼和非诉纠纷解决机制存在的问题各有不同,如诉讼方面存在依据不明等,而非诉方面则表现为非诉机制发展不全面。针对上述问题,可通过加强立法、监管以及非诉纠纷解决机制建设等途径,对燃气特许经营权纠纷解决机制进行完善。The urban gas franchise has natural monopoly,and the franchise agreement has the characteristics of great disparity of subject status and complex content.Therefore,the disputes of urban gas franchise are frequent and complex.The types of urban gas franchise disputes include the disputes between gas enterprises,between gas enterprises and the government,and between gas enterprises and users.There are different problems in the litigation and non-litigation dispute settlement mechanism of urban gas franchise,such as unclear basis in litigation,while the development of non-litigation mechanism is not comprehensive.In view of the above problems,we can improve the gas franchise dispute resolution mechanism by strengthening legislation,supervision and the construction of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism.
分 类 号:D922.181[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117