问题与完善:公安行政执法与刑事司法的法律条文衔接  

Problems and Improvement:Cohesion of Legal Provisions between Public Security Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice

作　　者：彭凯 PENG Kai

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《四川警察学院学报》2021年第2期25-30,共6页Journal of Sichuan Police College

基　　金：2015年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“法治中国建设背景下警察权研究”(15JZD010)。

摘　　要：在全面依法治国的重要背景下,公安行政执法与刑事司法之间的衔接既是一个需要厘清的理论问题,也是一个需要探讨的实际问题。通过梳理我国《行政处罚法》《治安管理处罚法》和《刑法》等法律的有关条文,发现衔接公安行政执法与刑事司法的法律条文存在着一定的模糊性。这些模糊性主要体现为就同一行为:可能会分别评价为行政违法与行政犯罪;关于特定法律术语的规定不够明晰。其消除路径主要是:界定行政违法与行政犯罪的规范含义;设定行政违法与行政犯罪的制裁方式;确定行政违法与行政犯罪的适用原则;对行政违法与行政犯罪存在内在张力的法律条文可通过全国人民代表大会常务委员会出台法律解释予以解决。Under the important background of comprehensively ruling the country by law,the connection between public security administrative law enforcement and criminal justice is not only a theoretical issue to be clarified,but also a practical issue to be explored.Through combing the relevant provisions of administrative punishment law,public security management punishment law and criminal law and other laws in China,it is found that there are certain ambiguities in the legal provisions linking public security administrative law enforcement and criminal justice.These ambiguities are mainly reflected in that the same behavior may be evaluated as administrative violations and administrative crimes respectively,and the provisions on specific legal terms are not clear enough.Therefore,the normative meaning,sanctions,applicable principles should be defined and clarified to solve the above problems.Legal provisions with inherent tension on administrative violations and administrative crimes can be resolved through the legal interpretation issued by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress.

关 键 词：公安 行政执法 刑事司法 行政违法 行政犯罪 法律条文衔接 

分 类 号：D922.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]