马克思、恩格斯论述资本主义早期工人生活的真实语境——论《资本主义与历史学家》的谬误  

The Real Context of Marx and Engels’Comment of the Early Capitalist Workers’Life:On the Fallacy of Capitalism and Historians

作　　者：牛晓迪 NIU Xiaodi(School of Philosophy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872

出　　处：《湖南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第2期1-8,共8页Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：围绕“19世纪资本主义早期工业化发展对工人阶级生存状况的影响”这一论题,哈耶克等人向马克思、恩格斯发难,指责《英国工人阶级状况》对工人阶级生活遭遇的真实记录是对资本主义和工业革命的全然否定。实际上,马克思和恩格斯并未否认资本主义早期工业化之前工人的生活已经面临的各种苦难,而是拒绝借用这种苦难的面纱来掩人耳目,无视工人阶级在19世纪资本主义工业化早期依然艰难甚至深化的困苦的生存境遇。他们强调,相对而言的社会进步,并不能掩盖工人阶级表现不同但实质相同的异化处境。马克思、恩格斯正是在考察工人阶级劳动与生存状况的过程中,发现了工人阶级作为变革社会的历史主体所背负的伟大使命。Around the topic of“the influence of the development of early industrialization of capitalism on the living conditions of the working class”in the 19th century,Hayek and others made a challenge to Marx and Engels,accusing The Condition of the Working Class in Eenland that their true record of the life of the working class was a total denial of capitalism and industrial revolution.In fact,Marx and Engels did not deny the suffering of workers before the early industrialization of capitalism,but refused to use the veil of suffering to cover people’s eyes.Ignore the living conditions of the working class which were still or even deepened in the early stage of capitalist industrialization in the 19th century.The key to the problem is that relatively social progress can not cover up the performance of the working class Different but essentially the same alienation situation.It is in the process of examining the working class’s labor and living conditions that Marx and Engels discovered the great mission of the working class as the historical subject of social transformation.

关 键 词：马克思 恩格斯 《英国工人阶级状况》 《资本主义与历史学家》 资本主义早期工业化 

分 类 号：B032[哲学宗教—哲学理论]