Altmetrics在学术论文评价中的特征与优势分析——以医学健康领域为例  

The Characteristics and Advantages of Altmetrics in Academic Papers Evaluation:A Case Study of Medical and Health Sciences

作　　者：陈华芳[1] 向菲[1] CHEN HuaFang;XIANG Fei(School of Medicine and Health Management,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China)

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学医药卫生管理学院,武汉430030

出　　处：《数字图书馆论坛》2021年第2期19-26,共8页Digital Library Forum

摘　　要：本文将Altmetrics指标分为大众媒体、社交活动、学术使用、学术评论4类,以医学健康领域文章为研究对象,从论文、作者、期刊3个层面探究传统计量指标与Altmetrics指标的关系。研究发现,大众媒体、社交活动与大部分传统计量指标不相关,可以对传统引文评价体系进行补充,拓展学术成果影响力的计量范围;学术使用、学术评论多与传统计量指标相关,可以在一定程度上反映文章价值,对被引频次进行预测。此外,Altmetrics与传统计量指标相互“引流”。相较于传统引文评价指标,Altmetrics可以发现优秀的年轻学者和“宝藏”文献,更早地测量更广范围的学术影响力。The paper divided Altmetrics indicators into four categories:mass media,social activity,academic usage and academic commentary.Then analyze the correlation between Altmetrics and traditional metrics from three aspects of paper,author and journal based on the medical and health sciences articles.According to the result,mass media and social activity is not related to most of traditional metrics,so they can supplement the citation index and expand the measurement scope of articles’impact.While academic usage and academic commentary are mostly related to traditional metrics,they can reflect the value of articles to some degree and predict citations.In addition,Altmetrics and traditional metrics drain each other.Compared with the citation,Altmetrics can find excellent young scholars and“treasure”literature,and measure a wider range of academic impact earlier.

关 键 词：Altmetrics 计量指标 学术论文 论文评价 相关性分析 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学]