检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢赓 LU Geng(Department of Second General Surgery,Longyan First Hospital,Fujian Medical University,Longyan 364000,Fujian,China)
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属龙岩市第一医院普外二科,福建龙岩364000
出 处:《外科研究与新技术》2021年第1期17-18,共2页Surgical Research and New Technique
摘 要:目的对比分析经腹腹膜前(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)疝修补术与开放网塞加平片无张力疝修补术(open mesh plug and flat plate tension-free hernia repair,Rutkow)治疗腹股沟疝的疗效。方法将收治的100例腹股沟疝患者随机分成对照组与观察组,每组各50例。对照组接受Rutkow手术,观察组接受腔镜TAPP疝修补术对比两组的疗效。结果观察组的并发症(包括切口感染、复发、血清肿、尿潴留以及睾丸疼痛)明显少于对照组(6%对26%,P<0.05)。结论TAPP治疗腹股沟疝,手术风险和并发症较少,康复快,值得应用。Objective To comparatively analyze transabdominal preperitioneal hernia(TAPP)repair and open mesh plug and flat plate tension-free hernia repair(Rutkow)on inguinal hernia.Methods A total of 100 patients with inguinal hernia were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group with 50 patients in each group.The control group received Rutkow surgery and the observation group received endoscopic TAPP surgery to compare the efficacy of the two groups.Results Complications including incision infection,recurrence,seroma,urinary retention,and testicular pain in the observation group were less than those in the control group(6%vs.26%,P<0.05).Conclusion TAPP repair for inguinal hernia produces less surgical complications,lower operational risks,and faster recovery,thus it is worthy of application.
关 键 词:腹股沟疝 经腹腹膜前疝修补术 开放网塞加平片无张力疝修补术
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7