检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林胜鸿 Lin Shenghong
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院
出 处:《电子知识产权》2021年第4期57-63,共7页Electronics Intellectual Property
摘 要:337调查制度是现阶段美国针对知识产权的边境保护所采取的一项措施。从337调查制度的发展来看,其经历了几个阶段的修改后已经成为一项具备完整体系的制度。随着WTO相关机制的建立和完善,近年来美国针对337调查制度做出了一定程度上的修订,但并未改变337调查制度的本质。本文从美国337条款实践和立法修订后最新发展趋势剖析入手,通过对国民待遇原则的法理分析及认定标准探讨,对比分析337调查和美国知识产权司法诉讼得出美国337调查构成对WTO国民待遇原则之违反的结论。文章最后探讨在WTO争端解决机制下挑战其违规性的路径选择和具体策略。The Section 337 investigation is a measure taken by the United States for border protection of intellectual property rights at this stage.From the perspective of the development of the Section 337 investigation system,it has gone through several stages of revision and has become a complete system.With the establishment and improvement of WTO related mechanisms,the United States has made certain revisions to the Section 337 investigation system in recent years,but the nature of it has not changed.This article starts with the analysis of the latest development trends in the practice of Section 337 and the revision of the legislation,by analyzing the national treatment principle and discussing the identification standards,and comparing the Section 337 investigation and the US intellectual property judicial litigation,we can conclude that the Section 337 investigation constitutes the violation of WTO National Treatment Principle.The article finally discusses the path and specific strategies to challenge its violations under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49