机构地区:[1]武汉大学人民医院生殖医学中心,武汉430060 [2]湖北省辅助生育与胚胎发育医学临床研究中心,武汉430060
出 处:《生殖医学杂志》2021年第5期561-567,共7页Journal of Reproductive Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学青年基金项目(81701412);中国国家留学基金(201806275007);湖北省自然科学基金(2018CFB491);湖北省卫生健康科研基金项目(WJ2021M158);默克雪兰诺生殖医学基金(MerckSerono_CREATE-2016141)。
摘 要:目的探讨不同内膜准备方案对卵巢储备功能低下(DOR)患者行冻融胚胎移植(FET)妊娠结局的影响。方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年2月在武汉大学人民医院生殖中心行助孕治疗的DOR患者的582个FET周期,根据子宫内膜准备方式分为3组:促性腺激素释放激素激动剂降调节后激素替代周期组(GnRH-a+HRT组,n=153),人工周期组(HRT组,n=314)和自然周期组(NC组,n=115)。比较3种内膜准备方案的FET妊娠结局;再以女方年龄40岁为界,分为≥40岁及<40岁,分别统计分析不同内膜方案的妊娠结局。结果3组DOR患者的年龄、不孕年限、抗苗勒管激素(AMH)、基础FSH(bFSH)及体重指数(BMI)比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。3组患者的移植优胚数、移植胚胎数及移植胚胎类型(卵裂期胚胎/囊胚)比例均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。与HRT组相比,GnRH-a+HRT组和NC组的移植日子宫内膜厚度显著增加(P<0.05)。妊娠结局比较显示,GnRH-a+HRT组和HRT组的多胎妊娠率、种植率显著高于NC组(P<0.05)。女方年龄<40岁患者中GnRH-a+HRT组的临床妊娠率、多胎妊娠率、种植率及异位妊娠率均显著高于NC组,HRT组的种植率显著高于NC组(P<0.05);而女方年龄≥40岁的患者中各组间妊娠结局指标比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论GnRH-a+HRT内膜准备方案可提高DOR患者FET周期的种植率,尤其适用于年龄<40岁的DOR患者,可作为DOR患者有效的FET内膜准备方案。但同时也增加了多胎妊娠率,值得临床注意。Objective:To study the influence of different endometrial preparation protocols on the pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer(FET)in the patients with diminished ovarian reserve(DOR).Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 582 FET cycles of DOR patients in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University.The cycles were divided into three groups:GnRH agonist down-regulation combined with hormone replacement therapy group(GnRH-a+HRT group,n=153)and hormone replacement therapy group(HRT group,n=314),and the natural cycle group(NC group,n=115).The FET pregnancy outcomes of the three endometrial preparation protocols were compared.Then the patients were subdivided into≥40 years group and<40 years group according the female’s age.The pregnancy outcomes with different endometrial protocols were compared between the two groups.Results:Among the three groups of DOR patients,there were no significant differences in age,infertility years,anti-Müllerian hormone(AMH),basic FSH and BMI(P>0.05).There were no significant differences in the number of high-quality embryos,the number of embryos transferred,and the proportion of transferred embryo types(cleavage embryos/blastocysts)among the three groups(P>0.05).The endometrial thickness on the day of transplantation in the GnRH-a+HRT group and the NC group was significantly thicker than that in the HRT group(P<0.05).The multiple pregnancy rate and implantation rate of GnRH-a+HRT group and HRT group were significantly higher than those of NC group(P<0.05).In female age<40 years group,the clinical pregnancy rate,multiple pregnancy rate,implantation rate and ectopic pregnancy rate of the GnRH-a+HRT group were significantly higher than those of the NC group,and the implantation rate of HRT group was significantly higher than that of the NC group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the indicators of pregnancy outcome among the three endometrial preparation protocols in the female age≥40 years group(P>0.05).Conclusions:GnRH-a+HRT endometrial preparation pro
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...