德国知识产权侵权救济对惩罚性赔偿的扬弃分析  

Research on the rejection of punitive damages for intellectual property infringement relief in Germany

作　　者：胡海容[1] 石冰琪 HU Hairong;SHI Bingqi(Chongqing Intellectual Property School, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

机构地区：[1]重庆理工大学重庆知识产权学院,重庆400054

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2021年第4期139-146,共8页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“知识产权侵权适用惩罚性赔偿国际比较研究”(13CFX088);司法部法治建设与法学理论研究项目“标准必要专业反垄断诉讼的裁判规则研究”(15SFB3030)。

摘　　要：惩罚性赔偿通常被视为提高知识产权侵权赔偿标准和遏制侵权多发的重要方式。作为欧洲知识产权保护的典型代表,德国知识产权侵权救济中却并无惩罚性赔偿的身影。一方面是因为脱胎于德国民法理论的知识产权侵权救济秉持了全面赔偿的思路,另一方面则是因为德国凭借合理许可费、诉前侵权警告和分诉制度等很好地实现了全面赔偿。由此可见,惩罚性赔偿存在与否与知识产权侵权救济水平的高低并无直接关联性,而关键仍在于回归足额赔偿权利人这一知识产权侵权救济制度的核心。Punitive damages are often regarded as an important way to raise the standard of compensation and to deter infringement in intellectual property cases.As a typical representative of European intellectual property protection,Germany does not establish punitive damages in intellectual property infringement relief.On one hand,the remedy for intellectual property infringement derived from the German civil law theory holds the idea of full compensation;on the other hand,reasonable license fee,pre-lawsuit warning and separate trial help the right holder to be fully compensated.Therefore,there is no direct correlation between punitive damages and the level of intellectual property infringement relief.The key factor is to provide full compensation for the obligees,which is the core of intellectual property infringement relief system.

关 键 词：知识产权 侵权救济 惩罚性赔偿 足额赔偿 

分 类 号：DF13[政治法律—法学] DF17