检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周子琪 Zhou Ziqi(Law School,Anhui University,Hefei Anhui 230601)
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2021年第1期13-16,39,共5页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
摘 要:我国最新制定的动产物权冲突规范将意思自治纳入其中,是符合国际私法发展趋势的一大创举,顺应了市场经济蓬勃发展的必然要求。但通过比较和学习国际社会的立法经验,可以发现该项规则并没有很好地与国内的实体法相衔接,存在意思自治的主体不明确、适用范围过大及对第三人利益保护缺乏规定等诸多问题。为此应当在肯定第37条重要性的同时,通过限定意思自治范围、加强第三人保护及善用最密切联系等原则来加以完善。China's newly formulated regulations on the conflict of movable property rights include autonomy of will,which is a major innovation that in line with the development trend of private international law and conforms to the inevitable requirements of the vigorous development of the market economy.However,by comparing and studying the legislative experience of the international community,it can be found that the rule is not well connected with the domestic substantive law and lead to many problems,such as unclear subject of autonomy of will,large scope of application,and lack of the provisions on the protection of the interests of third parties.To this end,while affirming the importance of the article 37,it should be perfected by limiting the scope of autonomy of will,strengthening the protection of third parties,and making good use of the principle of the closest connection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117