检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李娜[1] LI Na(Deyang People's Hospital,Deyang,Sichuan 618000)
出 处:《智慧健康》2021年第1期145-148,共4页Smart Healthcare
摘 要:目的探讨躁动患者约束方案应用于颅脑损伤躁动患者的效果。方法采用便利抽样法,选择2018年10月至2019年12月期间入住某三甲医院神经外科的62例颅脑损伤患者,采用随机数字表法,单数为对照组,双数为实验组。实验组采用颅脑损伤躁动患者的约束方案;对照组采用常规约束方案。结果比较两组意外拔管、皮肤损伤、末梢循环障碍发生例数,实验组均少于对照组,在意外拔管及末梢循环障碍方面,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),皮肤损伤差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05);在患者满意度方面,使用院内通用的满意度调查表,实验组优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论颅脑损伤躁动患者的约束方案,能够降低躁动患者约束合并症的发生,保障病员的安全,同时,提高患者及家属的满意度。Objective To explore the effect of restraint scheme in restless patients with craniocerebral injury.Methods 62 patients with craniocerebral injury who were admitted to neurosurgery department of a top three hospital from October 2018 to December 2019 were selected by convenient sampling method.The odd number was the control group and the double number was the experimental group.The experimental group used the restraint scheme of restless patients with brain injury;the control group used the conventional restraint scheme.Results The number of cases of accidental extubation,skin injury and peripheral circulatory disturbance in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in skin injury (P>0.05).In terms of patients’ satisfaction,the experimental group was better than the control group by using the general satisfaction questionnaire (P<0.05).Conclusion The restraint scheme for the patients with restless brain injury can reduce the occurrence of restraint complications,ensure the safety of patients,and improve the satisfaction of patients and their families.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117