检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周光礼[1] Zhou Guangli
出 处:《新文科教育研究》2021年第1期124-131,144,共9页NEW LIBERAL ARTS EDUCATION RESEARCH
基 金:中国高等教育学会高等教育科学研究重点调研课题“一流大学内部治理结构与人才战略研究”(编号:2017ZD003)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:大学治理主要关注大学组织决策权力的分配,相当于中国的“领导体制”概念。寻找一个良好的治理结构来确保组织的有效运行,是我国大学治理变革的出发点。政策变迁依赖制度逻辑,制度逻辑的核心是一套躯体共享的类比关系。从类比关系的角度看,我国大学治理变革主要围绕“大学即政府”与“大学即企业”两种隐喻进行。1949—1991年,大学实行政治治理模式,制度的合法性建立在大学即政府的隐喻之上;1992—2011年,大学探索法人治理模式,制度的合法性建立在大学即企业的隐喻之上;2012年至今,大学试图整合政治治理与法人治理两种模式,建立中国特色的现代大学制度。University governance was not originated from China but from western countries. University governance mainly focuses on the power distribution of decision-making in university organization, which is generally equivalent to leadership system in China. Seeking a good governance method to ensure effective performance of educational institutions is the goal of reform in the first place. Changing policies are subject to institutional logics, with shared analogical relations at its core. From the analogical perspective, the reforms have two major themes, namely, university as the government and university as the enterprise. Chinese universities carried out political governance model from 1949 to 1991, when universities were regarded as government. From 1992 to 2011, however, universities resorted to the corporate governance mode where universities were regulated as enterprise. Since the year of 2012, Chinese universities have been committed to the integration of the two models to establish a modern university governance system with Chinese characteristics.
分 类 号:G647[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.115.20