检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁维特 Leong Vai Tac(Peking University Law School, Beijing 100871, China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《时代法学》2021年第2期35-41,共7页Presentday Law Science
摘 要:预算权分配是预算制度建构的核心,一般有立法主导和行政主导两种类型。现代法治国家为实现预算民主的价值追求,多选择立法主导型模式,由代议机关严格控制政府的财政收支。澳门在预算权分配的两种通行模式之外选择了具有自身特色的均衡制约型模式,这是基于其政治传统因地制宜做出的宪制安排。The allocation of budgetary power is the core of budgetary system construction.There are generally two types: legislative-led model and executive-led model. In order to realize the value of budget democracy, most modern law-based countries choose the legislative-led model, in which the representative organ strictly controls the government's financial revenue and expenditure. In addition to the two common models of budgetary power allocation, Macao has chosen a balanced and restrained model with its own characteristics, which is a constitutional arrangement based on its political traditions and adapted to local conditions. According to the principle of “one country, two systems”, the constitutional system of Macao's budget is different from the one of the state.
分 类 号:DF29[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.116.193