“不确定故意”的规范蕴含及其借鉴  

The Normative Implication of “Uncertain Intent” and Its Significance on Chinese Criminal Law

作　　者：王晓辉 Wang Xiaohui(Zhongyuan University of Technology,Zhengzhou,Henan 450007)

机构地区：[1]中原工学院法学院,河南郑州450007

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2021年第1期38-42,共5页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

基　　金：河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“金融科技创新背景下民间融资不法行为的刑法治理研究”(2018BFX018)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：我国司法实务中出现的不确定故意认定疑难案件,是罪责本质理论——心理责任论与规范责任论之扞格抵牾在罪过认定上的体现。为弥合两者之间的理论矛盾与逻辑冲突,可以整合、借鉴英美刑法中"蓄意+明知+轻率"的"知欲构造"和规范蕴含,以构建犯罪故意的类型体系。同时,吸收"主观轻率"中的合理因素,将罪过类型修改为"故意(仅指直接故意)+轻率+过失(仅指疏忽大意的过失)"构成的犯意体系。以此为"不确定预见+行为决意+反对危害结果发生"等不确定故意案件的认定提供解决思路。The uncertain and intentional cognizance of difficult cases in China’s judicial practice is a practical embodiment of the contradiction between the theory of the nature of criminal responsibility and the theory of normative responsibility in the cognizance of the crime.In order to bridge the theoretical contradiction and logical conflict between them,we can integrate and draw lessons from the"structure of knowledge and desire"and the standard meaning of"intentional+knowing+thoughtless"in Anglo-American criminal law,so as to construct the type system of criminal intent.At the same time,we should absorb the reasonable factors of"subjective recklessness"and change the type of crime to a criminal intent system composed of"intention(direct intention only)+recklessness+negligence(negligence only)".and provide solutions for the identification of uncertain intentional cases such as"uncertain foreseeing+behavior determination+opposing the occurrence of harmful results".

关 键 词：英美刑法犯意 不确定故意 规范蕴含 借鉴 

分 类 号：DF61[政治法律—刑法学]