检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院 [2]贵州大学
出 处:《上海政法学院学报(法治论丛)》2021年第2期140-150,共11页Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science & Law(The Rule of Law Forum)
基 金:2020年度中国博士后科学基金第67批面上资助项目“刑事治理现代化内在逻辑与推进路径研究”的阶段性研究成果,项目编号:2020M673298。
摘 要:在国家治理现代化进程中,罚金刑内涵有别于其他刑罚方法的独特治理性价值,是有效应对现代犯罪问题的科学方式,也是刑事制裁人道化、轻缓化和现代化的重要表现。当前我国罚金刑在配置和执行上存在设置地位不符、适用范围不广和执行力度不足等制度性缺憾,与国家治理现代化的需求存在不小差距。罚金刑治理性价值的充分释放,需要秉持新时代刑法治理性理念,革新罚金刑配置和执行的传统思路,以注重预防并兼顾报应为引导,积极借鉴域外罚金刑改革的经验和机制,推动我国罚金刑朝着更加合理化、精细化和现代化方向变革,使罚金刑既立足当代新阶段彰显新价值,又更好地契合国家治理现代化的新期待。In the process of modernizing national governance,the connotation of fine penalty is different from the unique governance value of other penalty methods.It is a scientific way to effectively deal with modern crimes and also an important manifestation of the humanization, mitigation and modernization of criminal sanctions. At present, there are institutional defects in the allocation and execution of fine penalty in China,such as inconsistent settings, inadequate scope of application,insufficient enforcement, etc., which is not an mall gap to meet the needs of national governance modernization.The full release of the governance value of fine penalty requires upholding the administrative concept of criminal law in the new era,innovating the traditional thinking of the allocation and enforcement of fine penalty, taking the prevention and retribution as the guide, and actively drawing on the experience and mechanisms of extraterritorial fine penalty reforms.This will push fine penalty of China to become more rationalized, refined, and modernized, making fine penalty not only show new value in the contemporary new stage, but also better meet the new expectations of national governance modernization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.15.179.198