中国古代文体“发展演变论”研究述评  

Review of the Study on the “Theory of Development and Evolution” of Ancient Chinese Genre

作　　者：王章才 WANG Zhangcai(Faculty of Cultural Communication,Henan University of Finance and Law,Zhengzhou 450046,Henan,China)

机构地区：[1]河南财经政法大学文化传播学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《惠州学院学报》2021年第1期44-49,共6页Journal of Huizhou University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(16XZW012)。

摘　　要：近期,中国古代文体学研究持续繁荣。但是,中国古代文体发展演变研究则一直很薄弱。这方面的专门而集中的论述文字迄今罕见;零星的议论则散见于中国古代文体学研究各方面的论著中。这些零散的议论,按内容可以逻辑地划分为三种:单体发变论;合体融渗发变论;全体浑和发变论。三种中,前两种为数较多,第三种极少,仅见于笔者。但只有第三种才是对文体"发变论"的宏观的、整体的和贯通的研究,所以亟待加强和深入。港台学界的相关研究则更薄弱。国外的相关研究也很缺乏,仅见一些汉学家有有关中国古代文体、文体融渗及演变等方面的零星论述。但国外也有一些理论,如混合剧种论、互文性理论、囊括说、视域融合论等,虽非直接论述中国文体的发展演变问题的,但对推进和加强"发变论"尤其是全体浑和"发变论"研究也具有一定借鉴意义。Recently,the study of ancient Chinese stylistics has been flourishing. However,the study on the evolution of ancient Chinese style has been very weak. Specialized and concentrated discourse on this aspect is so rare and sporadic discourse is scattered in various aspects of ancient Chinese stylistics. These scattered arguments can be logically divided into three categories according to their content:the theory of single evolution;the theory of integration and infiltration;and the theory of total muddiness and change. Of the three,the first two are in quantity,and the third one is in scarcity,which can only be seen in the author. But only the third type is a macro,holistic and coherent study of the theory of stylistic change. Therefore,it is urgent to strengthen and deepen the research. The relevant research in Hong Kong and Taiwan academic circles is even weaker. Relevant studies abroad are also scarce. Only a few Sinologists have sporadic discussions on ancient Chinese style,its infiltration and evolution. But there are also some theories abroad,such as mixed drama theory,intertextuality theory,encompassing theory and fusion of horizons theory. Although they do not directly discuss the development and evolution of Chinese style,they have certain reference significance for promoting and strengthening the study of"evolution theory",especially the"whole muddy"and"evolution theory".

关 键 词：中国文体学 中国古代文体发展演变论研究 述评 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]