小儿急性惊厥采取咪达唑仑注射与水合氯醛灌肠治疗的有效性及安全性分析  

Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam Injection and Chloral Hydrate Enema in Children with Acute Convulsion

作　　者：林泽太 LIN Ze-tai(Huangpu People's Hospital,Zhongshan,Guangdong 528429)

机构地区：[1]中山市黄圃人民医院,广东中山528429

出　　处：《智慧健康》2020年第35期70-71,74,共3页Smart Healthcare

摘　　要：目的探究对小儿急性惊厥患者,为了提高治疗效果,减少不良反应的发生,采用咪达唑仑注射与水合氯醛灌肠治疗的应用价值。方法本研究共有240例研究对象,均为小儿急性惊厥患者,120例采用水合氯醛灌肠治疗的患者为常规组,另120例采用咪达唑仑注射治疗的患者为研究组,所有研究对象均选自2018年1月至2019年12月。比较分析治疗效果以及不良反应的差异。结果研究组患者的有效率明显高于常规组;惊厥控制时间明显短于常规组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在不良反应发生率上,两组患者比较,差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对小儿急性惊厥患者,为了提高治疗效果,减少不良反应的发生,相比于水合氯醛灌肠治疗,采用咪达唑仑注射治疗的应用价值更高,值得推广。Objective To explore the value of midazolam injection and chloral hydrate enema in the treatment of acute convulsion in children.Methods There were 240 subjects in this study,all of them were children with acute convulsion,120 patients treated with chloral hydrate enema were in the routine group,another 120 patients treated with midazolam injection were in the study group,all of them were selected from January 2018 to December 2019.The therapeutic effect and adverse reactions were compared and analyzed.Results The effective rate of the patients in the study group was significantly higher than that in the routine group,and the control time of convulsion was significantly shorter than that in the routine group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion In order to improve the therapeutic effect and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions,midazolam injection is more valuable than chloral hydrate enema in the treatment of children with acute convulsion.

关 键 词：小儿急性惊厥 治疗效果 不良反应 咪达唑仑 水合氯醛 应用价值 

分 类 号：R720.597[医药卫生—急诊医学]