检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟非非 王霞[1] MENG Feifei;WANG Xia(Department of Orthopedics,Qilu Hospital of Shandong University,Jinan,Shandong Province,250012 China)
出 处:《中外医疗》2021年第10期159-162,共4页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
基 金:2019年度中国管理科学研究院教育科学研究所科教创新研究重点课题(JFYB1807)
摘 要:目的探究颈部脊髓损伤患者预防压力性损伤的系统护理成效。方法方便选取该院2018年5月—2019年8月收治的颈部脊髓损伤患者60例,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组30例。给予对照组患者常规护理,给予观察组患者系统护理。比较两组患者的护理成效。结果观察组皮肤状况良好率为93.33%、护理满意率为96.67%、护理后心理状况评估焦虑自评(47.15±4.65)分、抑郁自评(0.46±0.11)分,均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=9.317、5.192,t=7.519、2.416,P<0.05)。结论系统护理模式在预防颈部脊髓损伤患者的压力性损伤预防及治疗方面更有成效。Objective To explore the effectiveness of systemic nursing for patients with cervical spinal cord injury to prevent stress injury.Methods A total of 60 patients with cervical spinal cord injury treated in the hospital from May 2018 to August 2019 were conveniently selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group,with 30 cases in each group.The patients in the control group were given routine care and the patients in the observation group were given systematic care.Compared the nursing effectiveness of the two groups of patients.Results The observation group has a good skin condition rate of 93.33%,a nursing satisfaction rate of 96.67%,an anxiety self-evaluation(47.15±4.65)points,and a depression self-evaluation(0.46±0.11)points after nursing,which were significantly better than those of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=9.317,5.192,t=7.519,2.416,P<0.05).Conclusion The systemic nursing model is more effective in the prevention and treatment of pressure injury in patients with cervical spinal cord injury.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145