检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪华 孙霄兵[1] Wang Hua;Sun Xiaobing(Institute of World Medieval History,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130000,China;Huazhong Agricultural University Development Planning Department,Wuhan 430070,China)
机构地区:[1]东北师范大学世界中古史研究所,长春130000 [2]华中农业大学发展规划部,武汉430070
出 处:《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2021年第6期82-87,共6页Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
摘 要:我国高等教育法律体系的逻辑起点源于我国《宪法》和《教育法》及相应的中国教育法律体系,是中国教育法律体系的自然延伸和逻辑展开,但《高等教育法》与《学位条例》并存,造成高等教育法律体系的技术分离,更在法治实践中形成了高等教育和学位管理的二元化实施体制。通过对中国高等教育法律体系的实体结构、立法方式等进行系统分析,提出"十四五"期间,应当从法典化、一元化、层级化、类别化等方面完善我国高等教育法律体系。The logical starting point of China’s higher education legal system originates from China’s constitution,education law and its corresponding Chinese education legal system,which is the natural extension and logical expansion of China’s education legal system.However,the coexistence of Higher Education Law and Academic Degrees Ordinance has resulted in the technical separation of higher education legal system,and formed in the practice of rule of law the dual implementation system of management in higher education and academic discipline.Through the systematic analysis of the substantive structure and legislative mode of China’s higher education legal system,this paper puts forward that during the"fourteenth five-year plan"period,China’s higher education legal system should be improved from the aspects of codification,unification,hierarchy and classification.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D921[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222