检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩关锋 陈刚[2] Han Guanfeng;Chen Gang(People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038)
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038 [2]中国人民公安大学国家安全学院,北京100038
出 处:《警学研究》2021年第2期69-78,共10页Police Science Research
摘 要:公安行政复议在化解行政纠纷的过程中还存在行政性偏离和司法性不足的问题。坚持行政司法化的性质和"品"字形功能定位是公安行政复议发展的逻辑基础。通过"行政自制"理论和"审议民主"理论为公安行政复议的完善提供新的动力。以客观实情和现实需要为导向,对行政化下的内部弊病和司法化不足的制度缺陷提出完善建议。Public security administrative reconsideration has administrative deviation and judicial insufficiency in the process of resolving administrative disputes. Adhering to administrative judicialization and the form of "品" functional positioning is the logical basis for the development of public security administrative review. The theory of "administrative self-control" and "deliberative democracy" provide new impetus for the improvement of public security administrative reconsideration. Guided by objective facts and practical needs, it provides suggestions on the internal ills of administrativeization and the system defects of insufficient judicialization. Guided by objective facts and practical needs, it provides suggestions on the internal and judicialization of administrativeization.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249