论夫妻生育权的性别分离  

On the Gender Separation of Procreation Rights

作　　者：路正 LU Zheng(School of Law,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)

机构地区：[1]天津大学法学院,天津300072

出　　处：《山东青年政治学院学报》2021年第3期77-83,共7页Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science

摘　　要：生育权因其内容的模糊性和实现方式的特殊性,常会在具体适用过程中特别是夫妻之间产生冲突。生育权的性质是人格权而非身份权,主体是单独的自然人而非家庭。因权利本体即为正当性、权利行使的涉他性和权利边界的模糊性,权利冲突现象不可避免。我国夫妻生育权的冲突现象植根于封建传统思想的固有观念,不是法治社会的当然内容。将婚姻与生育加以无法律根据的必要关联,将婚内女性的生育权等同于女性对男性的生育义务,并以此主张男性的生育权实现,是秉持与法治理念背离的传统观念对生育权的不当理解。男女双方因身体构造不同,生育权的具体内容和实现方式自始不同。夫妻生育权冲突不是一个真正的权利冲突现象。Due to the vagueness of its content and the particularity of its realization method, reproductive rights often cause conflicts in the specific application process, especially between husband and wife. The nature of reproductive rights is personality rights rather than identity rights, and the subject is a single natural person rather than a family. Because rights are the legitimacy itself, the otherness of the right exercise, and the ambiguity of the right boundary, conflicts of rights are inevitable. The phenomenon of conflicts between husband and wife’s reproductive rights in my country is rooted in the inherent concepts of traditional feudal thinking, and is not a natural content of a society ruled by law. It is a mistake to give a necessary link between marriage and childbirth and to equate women’s reproductive rights with women’s fertility obligations to men. Due to the different body structures of the male and female, the specific content and realization of their reproductive rights are different from the beginning. The conflict of reproductive rights between husband and wife is not a real conflict of rights phenomenon.

关 键 词：权利冲突 生育权 男性生育权 权利边界 

分 类 号：D923.9[政治法律—民商法学]