检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方燕[1] YAN FANG(Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院
出 处:《产业经济评论》2021年第3期34-49,共16页Review of Industrial Economics
摘 要:本文重新明确和强调了互联网数字变革时期解析反垄断立法和执法的目标诉求和审查范式的必要性和急迫性,从错误成本角度明确反垄断执法犯错的可能性。新时期反垄断和竞争政策的终极目标诉求是实现长期的经济效率或社会福利最大化,需要足够重视动态竞争因素和动态效率维度,防止执法目标多元化和泛化倾向。实现经济效率的通用性手段是维持竞争秩序而非保护竞争者利益。所有竞争审查分析范式都无法规避市场界定难题。按照假阳性和假阴性错误总和最小化的原则推进互联网反垄断工作。This paper re-emphasizes the need and urgency of analyzing anti-monopoly legislation and law enforcement's target claims and censorship paradigms during the period of Internet digital technology change,and makes clear the possibility of anti-monopoly law enforcement making mistakes from the perspective of wrong cost.The ultimate goal of anti-monopoly and competition policy in the new period is to realize the maximization of long-term economic efficiency or social welfare,and to pay enough attention to dynamic competitive factors and dynamic efficiency dimensions to prevent the diversification and generalization tendency of law enforcement objectives.The universal means of economic efficiency is to maintain the order of competition rather than protect the interests of competitors.All competition review analysis paradigms can't circumvent market definition challenges.Promote Internet antitrust efforts in accordance with the principle of the sum and minimization of false positive and false negative errors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.201