检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张幸 余强[1] 曹健 周春晓[1] 张金坤[1] ZHANG Xing;YU Qiang;CAO Jian;ZHOU Chun-xiao;ZHANG Jin-kun(Department of Gastroenterology,Suzhou Municipal Hospital,215000 Suzhou,Jiangsu China)
出 处:《临床消化病杂志》2021年第2期107-109,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
基 金:江苏省青年医学重点人才项目(QNRC2016239)。
摘 要:[目的]研究住院及门诊两种场所对各年龄层患者肠道准备效果的影响。[方法]回顾性分析住院及门诊行结肠镜检查的患者共158例,评估各患者肠道准备情况,比较各年龄层段,门诊及住院患者肠道准备清洁度的差异。[结果]年龄对患者肠道准备效果无统计学差异。门诊组患者的肠道准备合格率明显高于住院组(85.19%∶66.23%,P<0.01),门诊组<50岁患者肠道准备合格率明显高于住院组,2组比较差异有统计学意义(90.91%∶66.67%,P<0.05)。[结论]对于<50岁的年轻患者,门诊宣教指导后于家中完善肠道准备可有助于提高患者肠道准备效果,而对于≥50岁患者,可根据患者病情选择相应肠道准备地点。[Objective]To study the effect of different settings(inpatient and outpatient)on intestinal preparation in patients of all ages.[Method]A total of 158 patients who underwent colonoscopy in our hospital from January 2019 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.The intestinal preparation of every patient was evaluated,and the difference of intestinal preparation cleanliness between outpatient and inpatient patients was compared.[Results]There was no statistical difference in the effect of age on intestinal preparation.The rate of intestinal cleanliness in the outpatient group was significantly higher than that in the inpatient group(85.19%vs 66.23%,P<0.01),especially in patients under 50 years(90.91%vs 66.67%,P<0.05).[Conclusion]For patients younger than 50 years old,home education and guidance can improve the effect of intestinal preparation,while for patients over 50 years,appropriate intestinal preparation sites can be selected according to the patient’s condition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.146.87