徐伯龄《蟫精隽》中的词学批评及其词史价值  

Ci Criticism of Xu Boling’s Yin Jing Jun and Its Historical Value

作　　者：李碧 彭志 LI Bi;PENG Zhi(Theoretical Research Institute of Art,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310018;Research Institute of Chinese Culture,Chinese National Academy of Arts,Beijing 100012)

机构地区：[1]浙江理工大学艺术学理论研究所,浙江杭州310018 [2]中国艺术研究院中国文化研究所,北京100012

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2021年第2期108-113,共6页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“《全明词》重编及文献研究”(12&ZD158)。

摘　　要：明代文学研究存在着偏重晚明而忽视中前期的问题,文学发展过渡期的不稳定性导致了失衡的文学史叙述,边纠偏边拾遗显得十分必要。《蟫精隽》便是典型一例,此书因被《四库全书》编入子部而被词学研究者忽略,其著述的49条词论堪比一部小型词话,且具有明确的词史观和词学观。主要价值在于:(1)较早地关注到秦观词的价值,开词情论风气之先;(2)提出"词贵圆滑"的词学观念;(3)打破代表性词人个体的论述格局,在充分肯定马洪词的同时,扩大到刘泰等人,勾勒出代表性词人群像,丰富了明中期词坛。徐伯龄在论词过程中对格律的忽视,犯下了明词托体不尊的通病,是为其局限所在。There are obvious problems in literature research of Ming Dynasty,which emphasize late but neglect early and middle period. The instability in transitional of literature development leads to unbalanced narration of history. It is necessary to rectify deviation and pick up remains at the same time. Yin Jing Jun is a typical example. This book was neglected by lexicology researchers because it was incorporated into the sub part of Siku Quanshu. 49 Ci theories are comparable to a small-scale Ci criticism,and have a clear view of Ci history and its ology. The main values are as follows:first,pay attention to the value of Qin Guan’s Ci earlier,and start Ci sentiment theory;second,put forward the concept of "fluency and mild are precious for Ci";third,break individual discussion pattern of representative Ci writers,fully affirm Ma Hong’s Ci,expand to Liu Tai and others,and outline the group image of representative ones,which greatly enriched the Ci group in the middle of Ming Dynasty. Xu’s neglect of metrical rules in process of discussing Ci poetry made a common fault that Ci in the Ming Dynasty didn’t respect stylistic rules and layout.

关 键 词：徐伯龄 《蟫精隽》 词学批评 词史价值 

分 类 号：I207.23[文学—中国文学]