《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(2019修正)对电子文件管理工作的启示  

The Enlightenment of the Amendment of Several Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Evidence in Civil Procedure(2019Amendment)on Electronic Records Management

作　　者：许晓彤 XU Xiaotong(School of History and Culture,Shandong University,Ji'nan 250100,China;Electronic Records Management Research Center of Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学历史文化学院,济南250100 [2]中国人民大学电子文件管理研究中心,北京100872

出　　处：《档案学通讯》2021年第3期98-105,共8页Archives Science Bulletin

基　　金：教育部规划基金项目“数字保存的成本计量与控制研究”(20YJA870018);山东大学基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“单轨制背景下的电子文件证据效力保障体系构建研究”(2020GN056)。

摘　　要：基于电子文件管理与电子证据司法应用的共通之处,分析了《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(2019修正)对电子文件管理的积极意义。分别解读了电子证据审查认定条款与正常业务活动中形成、档案管理方式保管、中立第三方平台保管这三种电子文件管理模式的具体关联,进而从国家层面、行业层面与机构层面论述了对电子文件管理工作的启示:加强档案法规标准与电子证据审查认定条款的衔接,商业性档案服务机构与档案馆积极参与存证保全,实现电子文件-电子证据全链条痕迹留存。Based on the commonalities between electronic records management and the judicial application of electronic evidence,this paper analyzes the positive significance of the amendments to the Several Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Evidence in Civil Procedures(2019 Amendment)on electronic records management.Furthermore,conclude the electronic records management patterns,such as regular business patterns,archival treatment patterns,and third-party organization management patterns.Then interpreted connections between relevant clauses and those patterns respectively.Enlightenment is discussed from the national level,industry level,and institutional level.Those are strengthening the connection between archives regulations and standards and electronic evidence review and determination clauses,commercial archive service organizations and archives participating in the preservation of electronic evidence,and keeping the trace of the entire chain from electronic records to electronic evidence.

关 键 词：电子文件 电子证据 电子数据 

分 类 号：G270.7[文化科学—档案学]