商标侵权损害赔偿数额计算的现状与展望  

The Current Situation and Prospect of Trademark Damages Calculation in Chinese Legal Practices

作　　者：张鹏[1,2] Zhang Peng

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所 [2]中国社会科学院知识产权中心

出　　处：《知识产权》2021年第5期15-29,共15页Intellectual Property

基　　金：中日联合研究项目的两国学者及实务专家的指导,在此衷心表示感谢。

摘　　要：我国商标侵权损害赔偿数额计算的各种规则之间往往不存在共通的理论指引,实践中经常从不同理念出发对各种规则进行论述,其中不乏相互抵触的情况,很难为实务提供有效的指引。鉴于此,应将现有的各种规则依“损失填补性”与“侵权制裁性”予以类型化。其中在“损失填补性”计算方法的适用上,实际损失、侵权获利、许可费倍数以及法定赔偿四种计算方法作为“损失”的金钱衡量,分别从不同角度服务于抑制侵权的制度目的;而在“侵权制裁性”计算方法的适用上,除须明确其适用的实体要件外,仍有必要协调民事、行政与刑事程序,防止双重制裁等过度抑制现象的发生。The theoretical guidelines among the rules for calculating trademark tort damages vary in China.In practice,the various rules are discussed from different theoretical perspectives,leading to conflicts and unpredictability for providing effective guidance in legal practices.To solve the problem,it is suggested to categorize the existing rules into"compensatory damages calculation"and"punitive damages calculation".In applying the"compensatory damages calculation",the actual loss,infringement profits,multiples of license fees,and statutory compensation are often used for measuring money"loss",which serves the institutional purpose of inhibiting infringement from different perspectives;while in applying"punitive damages calculation",besides clarifying the substantive requirements,it is still necessary to coordinate the civil,administrative,and criminal procedures,to prevent excessive deterrence such as double punishments.

关 键 词：商标法 诉讼时效 惩罚性赔偿 法定赔偿 实际损失 侵权获利 许可费倍数 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]