私有社会的出现——以货币为视角评析洛克的财产理论与解释思路  

The Emergence of Private Society:Comment on Locke’s Property Theory and Its Explanations from the Perspective of Money

作　　者：侯杰耀 Hou Jieyao(University Beijing)

机构地区：[1]北京大学哲学系,100871

出　　处：《哲学评论》2018年第2期96-111,共16页Wuda Philosophical Review

摘　　要：针对《政府论》财产权一章以货币为分界点的占有差异,麦克弗森认为洛克支持资本主义无限占有,剑桥学派的代表塔利选择了劳动义务论思路,而施特劳斯学派的代表扎科特承认了无限占有的可能性。通过厘清货币的性质、同意的含义、货币的转折意义,个人占有的性质不是共有财产而是私人财产。从历史语境出发,洛克的财产理论不具有资本主义的写作意图,但从文本逻辑出发,洛克的财产理论隐含了个体占有可以增加社会整体财富的积极作用。Faced with the different occupation before and after the money appeared in the fifth chapter of Two treatises of governmentⅡ,Macpherson thinks Locke are for the unlimited occupation,Tully explains Locke by labor obligation and Zuckert believes the possibility of unlimited occupation.By understanding the nature of money,the meaning of consent and the significance of money,we find the nature of private occupation is not common property but private property.From the point of historical context,there is no capitalist writing intent in Locke’s property theory,but from the point of text’s logic,there is hidden positive effect of personal occupation on the increase of society welfare.

关 键 词：洛克 《政府论》 财产 货币 劳动 

分 类 号：F091.3[经济管理—政治经济学] F014