俄(苏)与西方科学哲学比较研究的基础和路径  

A Comparison Research of Philosophy of Science in the West and Russian(Soviet Union)

作　　者：孙玉忠[1] 邹恒 SUN Yuzhong;ZOU Heng(School of Marxism,Harbin Normal University,Harbin,Heilongjiang,150025)

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨师范大学马克思主义学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150025

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2021年第6期100-104,共5页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“历史语境视野下的前苏联(俄罗斯)与西方科学哲学比较研究”(项目编号:13BZX019)。

摘　　要：西方科学哲学并不是科学哲学唯一的形式,20世纪俄(苏)马克思主义科学哲学也取得了重要的成就。发掘、阐释马克思主义科学哲学的思想资源和理论贡献,并通过比较来彰显马克思主义科学哲学的理论优势是一项重要的工作。对西方与俄(苏)两种相对"异质"的科学哲学进行比较,前提是科学的自在本性与科学哲学的超越性和观念性。科学的自在本性保证了科学哲学研究对象的一致性。科学哲学的超越性是可比较的基础,观念性是差异的根源。科学哲学的比较研究通过三种路径进行,发生学路径凸显两者在历史语境、研究导向上的差异与一致,结构学路径显现出研究主题与研究内容的分歧与共性,过程学路径从历史角度展示他们各自发展道路的个性与趋同。Western philosophy of science is not the only form of philosophy of science,Russian (Soviet) marxist philosophy of science also has made important achievements in the 20th century.It is important to explore and interpret the ideological resources and theoretical contributions of marxist philosophy of science and to demonstrate the theoretical advantages of marxist philosophy of science by comparison.To compare the two relative "heterogeneous" philosophy of science in the west and Russia (Soviet Union),the premise is the nature of science itself and the transcendence and concept of philosophy of science.The nature of science guarantees the consistency of the research objects in philosophy of science.The transcendence of philosophy of science is the basis of comparison,and the concept is the root of difference.The comparative study was conducted through three paths,the path of origin highlights their differences and consistency in historical context and research orientation,the structural path shows the divergence and commonality of the research topic and content,the path of process shows the personality and convergence of their respective development paths from a historical perspective.

关 键 词：科学哲学 比较研究 基础 路径 

分 类 号：NO