检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龚艳 蒋琪霞 陈文芳 王海宏[4] 马丽[5] GONG Yan;JIANG Qi-xia;CHEN Wen-fang;WANG Hai-hong;MA Li(School of Nursing,Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210023,China;Dept.of Burn and Plastic Surgery,General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command,Nanjing 210002,China;Dept.of Urology,General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command,Nanjing 210002,China;Dept.of Gynecology,Xuzhou Central Hospital,Xuzhou 221200,China;Dept.of Surgical Oncology,Xuzhou Central Hospital,Xuzhou 221200,China)
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学护理学院,江苏南京210023 [2]中国人民解放军东部战区总医院烧伤整形科,江苏南京210002 [3]中国人民解放军东部战区总医院泌尿外科,江苏南京210002 [4]徐州市中心医院妇科,江苏徐州221200 [5]徐州市中心医院肿瘤外科,江苏徐州221200
出 处:《护理学报》2021年第9期66-70,共5页Journal of Nursing(China)
基 金:上海王正国创伤医学发展基金会课题(WZGF20200101)。
摘 要:目的比较并评价手术获得性压力性损伤风险评估量表、Braden性压力性损伤风险评估量表、Munro围术期成人压力性损伤风险评估量表对外科择期手术患者手术获得性压力损伤的预测效果,为临床选择使用适宜量表提供依据。方法选取2所三级甲等医院2019年12月-2020年6月外科择期手术患者237例,应用3种量表于术前、术中、术后对患者进行压力性损伤风险评估和皮肤检查。比较3种量表的预测效果和操作便利性。结果手术获得性压力性损伤风险评估量表、Braden压力性损伤风险评估量表、Munro围术期成人压力性损伤风险评估量表,术前ROC曲线下面积AUC分别为0.695、0.619、0.684;术中ROC曲线下面积AUC分别为0.848、0.633、0.882;术后ROC曲线下面积AUC分别为0.861、0.757、0.870;3种量表的评估用时比较,手术获得性压力性损伤风险评估量表评估用时最短。结论手术获得性压力性损伤风险评估量表对手术获得性压力性损伤患者预测能力较好,方便使用,值得临床推广应用。Objective To compare and evaluate the prediction effect of Intraoperatively Acquired Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale,Braden Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale and the Munro Assessment Scale for pressure injury risk in adult patients with selective operations,and to provide reference for appropriate scale of clinical practice.Methods A total of 237 patients with selective operations from December 2019 to June 2020 were selected from two tertiary,grade A hospitals and they were surveyed by using the three scales to assess the risk of pressure injury and skin examination for each patient before,during and after the surgery.The prediction effect and operation convenience of the three scales were analyzed and compared.Results For intraoperatively acquired pressure injury risk assessment scale,Braden pressure injury risk assessment scale and the Munro assessment scale for pressure injury risk,the AUC of preoperative area under the ROC curve of the three scale during perioperative period was 0.695,0.619 and 0.684,respectively;that was 0.848,0.633 and 0.882,respectively during the surgery and that after the operation was 0.861,0.757 and 0.870,respectively.By comparing the assessment time of the three scales,the assessment time of intraoperatively acquired pressure injury risk assessment scale was the shortest.Conclusion The intraoperatively acquired pressure injury risk assessment scale has good predictive effect in patients with surgical acquired pressure injury.It is convenient and worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40