重新认识法的自主性  

Reconceptualizing the Autonomy of Law

作　　者：於兴中[1,2] Yu Xingzhong(Anthony W.and Lulu C.Wang Professor in Chinese Law,Cornell University Law School)

机构地区：[1]美国康奈尔大学法学院 [2]杭州师范大学,杭州311121

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2021年第6期51-58,157,158,共10页Zhejiang Social Sciences

摘　　要：法的自主性是法学研究中的一个重大问题,也是现代法律制度赖以建立的一个重要理论支柱。传统的法学理论对法的自主性都有过不同程度的论述。智能科技与法的互动为进一步思考传统的法律思维和法律问题提供了可能性。在新的背景下重新思考法的自主性问题有利于深入了解并预期法这个社会现象在吸纳了科技内容后的功能和作用,以便处理好新兴的法律关系和问题,处理好法律中的科学和科学中的法律。智能网络、区块链、便捷合同、数据空间、算法等概念与实践在一定程度上都具有自主性的特点,而调整它们的法律在一定程度上也具有自主性。如果说绝对意义上的法的自主性只能是理想,那么相对意义上的法的自主性并不是可望不可及的,因而也是不可忽视的。The autonomy of law is a significant issue in legal studies and an essential theoretical pillar upon which the modern legal system is built.Traditional legal theories have discussed the autonomy of law to varying degrees.However,critical jurisprudence and postmodern jurisprudence have been skeptical of the autonomy of law.The interaction between intelligent technology and law offers the possibility for further consideration of traditional legal thinking and legal issues.Rethinking the autonomy of law in a new context facilitates a deeper understanding and anticipation of the function and role of law as a social phenomenon after it incorporates technological content.Such an understanding will help deal with emerging legal relations and problems,with science in law and law in science.Concepts and practices such as intelligent networks,blockchain,smart contracts,data spaces,algorithms,etc.,are to a certain extent characterized by autonomy.The laws that regulate them are,to some extent,also autonomous.If the autonomy of law in the absolute sense is only an ideal or even a myth,then the autonomy of law in the relative sense is not unattainable and cannot be ignored.

关 键 词：法的自主性 智能科技 相对自主性 数据空间 系统论法学 代码即法律 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]