检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李瑜 宋勇莉 田超永 刘永收 梁昆 张媛 秦梅 查定军 LI Yu;SONG Yongli;TIAN Chaoyong;LIU Yongshou;LIANG Kun;ZHANG Yuan;QIN Mei;ZHA Dingjun(Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University,Xi'an,710032,China)
机构地区:[1]空军军医大学第一附属医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,西安710032
出 处:《临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》2021年第4期293-296,301,共5页Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery
基 金:空军军医大学第一附属医院学科助推项目(No:XJZT18MDT07)。
摘 要:目的:对比新型远程雷达监测设备与PSG监测结果的一致性。方法:选取71例患者的监测结果,观察对比两种检测设备对同一患者监测数据的差异性。结果:以监测结果中AHI≥5作为诊断标准,与PSG监测结果比较,新型远程雷达监测设备筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的敏感度为96.2%,特异度为89.5%,Youden指数为0.857(P<0.01);以PSG结果中LSaO_(2)≤90%作为诊断标准,新型远程雷达监测设备筛查OSA的敏感度为94.3%,特异度为88.9%,Youden指数为0.832(P<0.01)。结论:新型远程雷达监测设备可以作为OSA患者的便携监测设备。Objective: The result consistency between the new remote radar monitoring equipment and PSG detection is compared. Methods: The monitoring results of 71 patients were randomly selected to observe and compare the difference of monitoring data of the same patient with two kinds of detection equipment. Results: Using AHI≥5 as the diagnostic criteria, compared with PSG monitoring results, the sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of the new remote radar monitoring equipment were 96.2%, 89.5% and 0.857(P<0.01) respectively. Compared with PSG monitoring results, when LSaO_(2)≤90% in PSG monitoring, the sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of the new remote radar monitoring equipment were 94.3%, 88.9% and 0.832(P<0.01) respectively. Conclusion: There the new remote radar monitoring device can be used to monitor OSA.
分 类 号:R766[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.198.25