C.J.阿瑟对《资本论》的“新解读”及其理论症结  

C.J. Arthur’s “New Interpretation” of Das Kapital and Its Theoretical Crux

作　　者：周露平 ZHOU Lu-ping

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学马克思主义学院,上海220000

出　　处：《中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第3期18-28,共11页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“马克思思想的整体性论域与理论效应”(18FZX024);江苏省社会科学基金项目“《资本论》第二手稿的理论地位与哲学思想”(18ZXB004)。

摘　　要：克里斯多夫·约翰·阿瑟是欧洲"新辩证法运动"的积极推动者与思想资源提供者。阿瑟的新辩证法的理论核心,是以价值形式的辩证法为内容,考察现代资本主义交换方式。阿瑟的新辩证法从"形式与内容的关系"出发,颠倒《资本论》所要呈现的批判内容。具体而言,阿瑟的错误在于,将价值形式的辩证运动看作资本主义历史运动全貌,试图以此重新考察资本剥削问题,进而批判劳动价值论、剩余价值论与无产阶级革命论,走向批判《资本论》之路。阿瑟新辩证法的理论局限在于,没有看到《资本论》研究不局限于考察资本主义的交换关系,而是深入批判资本主义的内在矛盾。Christopher John Arthur(C.J.Arthur) is an active promoter and ideological resource provider of the "new dialectics movement" in Europe.Arthur’s new dialectics, with the dialectics of value forms as the main content, examines modern capitalist exchange methods.It starts from the "relationship between form and content" and distorts the critical content presented in Das Kapital.Specifically, Arthur’s mistake is to regard the dialectical movement of value forms as the full picture of the historical movement of capitalism, trying to re-examine the problem of capital exploitation based on this, and then criticize the labor theory of value, the theory of surplus value and that of proletarian revolution, thus criticize Das Kapital.The theoretical limitation of Arthur’s new dialectics is that it fails to find that the core of Das Kapital is not only the investigation of the exchange relationship of capitalism, but also criticism of the intrinsic contradictions of capitalism.

关 键 词：C.J.阿瑟 资本论 新辩证法 理论症结 批判立场 

分 类 号：A811.23[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]